Legal Opinion
United States v. Landry
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 31, 1989No. CR. 3-88-090(02)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR IMPOSING SENTENCE
MAGNUSON, District Judge.
I. Findings of Fact
Neither the government nor the defendant, Kelvin Alonzo Landry, has objected to the factual statements contained in the presentence investigation report (PSI). The court therefore adopts those statements as its findings of fact. For purposes of this opinion the court will provide a synopsis of those findings and will highlight the facts that are pertinent to sentencing.
On September 28, 1988, a federal grand jury returned a five count indictment against Landry and three other defendants. Count I of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Daniel FaticoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Perry York, United States of America v. Peter Andrew RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Carl P. FogelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Esau Juarez-OrtegaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Randolph JakobetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Lloyd BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Marion Johnson, Marshall Johnson, Willie Lee DancyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. ClarkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- United States v. Lloyd BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.