Legal Opinion

United States v. Martin Templeton Stockdale

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1998No. 96-30199PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Opinion filed November 20, 1997, and appearing at slip op. 13971 [129 F.3d 1066] is amended as follows:

At slip op. page 13977 [129 F.3d at 1069], at the end of the last sentence preceding the word “AFFIRMED,” add the following footnote:

After we filed our opinion in this case, United States v. Stockdale, 129 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir.1997), counsel informed us that the Sixth Circuit had taken a contrary view, in United States v. Clark, 110 F.3d 15 (6th Cir.1997). Additionally, the Eighth Circuit has since disagreed with our view, in United States v. Mihm, 134 F.3d 1353 (8th Cir.1998). In our…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Kelly Ann ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronnie G. MULLANIX, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin Templeton STOCKDALE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. George Henry MihmCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Barry JordanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Elias v. O'ConnorDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2021
  3. United States v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. StockdaleDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API