Omaha Street Railway Co. v. Clair
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. .Tried below before Doane, J. cited : Warner v. People’s Street R. Co., 141 Pa. St., 615; Miller v. St. Paul City R. Co., 42 Minn., 454; Thomas v. Passenger Railway, 132 Pa. St-., 504; Busby v. Philadelphia Traction Co., 126 Pa.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Douglas county. .Tried below before Doane, J. cited : Warner v. People’s Street R. Co., 141 Pa. St., 615; Miller v. St. Paul City R. Co., 42 Minn., 454; Thomas v. Passenger Railway, 132 Pa. St-., 504; Busby v. Philadelphia Traction Co., 126 Pa. St., 559; Weber v. Kansas City Cable R. Co., 100 Mo., 194; Belton v. Baxter, 54 N. Y., 245 ; Fenton v. Second Avenue Railway, 126 N. Y., 625; Adolph v. Central Parle, N. & E. R. R. Co., 76 N. Y., 530; Spencer v. Illinois C. R. Co., 29 la., 55; Brown v. Milwaukee & St. P. R. Co., 22 Minn., 165; Cordell v. New York C. &…
1Opinion of the Court
Ryan, C.
This action was brought against the Omaha Street Railway Company, and successfully maintained, for the recovery of damages on account of personal injuries sustained by the defendant in error. The allegations of his petition, upon *456which the liability of the railway company was predicated in the district court of Douglas county, wherein the judgment was obtained, were made in the following language : “On or about the 24th day of December, 1889, the plaintiff wás passing along Fourteenth street in the city of Omaha, at the intersection of Dodge street and Fourteenth street, between the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Bowers v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1912