Legal Opinion

Sgarlata v. City of Schenectady

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy A. Graves, J.

This trial arose from flood conditions which occurred on the morning of August 28, 1971. The plaintiffs allege they incurred damages through the negligence of the City of Schenectady. By stipulation of counsel, only the question of liability was at issue in this trial.

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

During the night of August '27 to 28, a steady rain had fallen in the City of Schenectady. At about 9 :00 a.m, on the 28th, water flowing from continued rainfall in the streets in the lower Broadway area and Broadway area of the city, began to rise slowly; shortly thereafter a manhole cover over a large drain,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seifert v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. McCarthy v. . the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Barton v. . the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. O'Donnell v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Smith v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tappan Wire & Cable, Inc. v. County of RocklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Slemp v. City of North MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API