Bankruptcy of Daniels
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Decision op
Dole, J.
The claim of Buckingham & Hecht, a San Francisco firm, was formally proved Majr 4, 1891. Afterwards, to-wit, November 23, 1891, on motion of the assignee, the proof of this claim was vacated by the order of the court, in order that the assignee might contest the same. A hearing was had April 8, 1892, in which evidence was taken, by which it appeared that an agent of the claimants, named Young, came to Daniels in 1890, and *747solicited orders from him on the claimants, and succeeded in obtaining an order for shoes, to the amount of $1061.90, which is the present claim. The…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Wilson v. Kealakekua Ranch, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976