Legal Opinion

Bankruptcy of Daniels

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Decision op

Dole, J.

The claim of Buckingham & Hecht, a San Francisco firm, was formally proved Majr 4, 1891. Afterwards, to-wit, November 23, 1891, on motion of the assignee, the proof of this claim was vacated by the order of the court, in order that the assignee might contest the same. A hearing was had April 8, 1892, in which evidence was taken, by which it appeared that an agent of the claimants, named Young, came to Daniels in 1890, and *747solicited orders from him on the claimants, and succeeded in obtaining an order for shoes, to the amount of $1061.90, which is the present claim. The…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. Kealakekua Ranch, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API