Legal Opinion

Meyers v. LAKELAND SUPPLY, INC.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 27, 2001No. 00-C-1372PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER DATED DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JURY TRIAL AS TO DAMAGES

REYNOLDS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Elmer C. Meyers (“Meyers”) alleges that his former employer, defendant Lakeland Supply, Inc. (“Lakeland”), unlawfully terminated Meyers’ employment on the basis of age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). Because this action involves a question of federal law, the court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Because Lakeland has never answered or otherwise responded to Meyers’ December 18, 2000 complaint, Meyers has filed a motion for default…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Midland Contracting Co. v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DUNCANSON v. WINE AND CANVAS IP HOLDINGS LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API