Legal Opinion

Diehl v. Marchant

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 12, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from decree of circuit court of Middlesex county, rendered March. 18th, 1889, in the suit wherein the appellants, Daniel Diehl and Jane T. Diehl, his wife, were complainants, and J. It. Marchant was defendant. Opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtLacy, J.

The case is as follows: On the 8th day of March, 1880, J. R. Marchant and wife, in consideration of f1,133.50, conveyed a certain tract of land in said county to Jane T. Diehl, wife of Daniel Diehl. By trust-deeds of even date the said Jane T. Diehl *448and Daniel Diehl conveyed the same land in trust to secure the sum of $504.13, the balance unpaid of the purchase-money, to T. B. Rowe, trustee. The said trustee died without executing the trust. On the '27th of October, 1886, the county court of Middlesex, on the motion of the said J. R. Marchant, appointed W. W. Woodward trustee to execute the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Durant v. Essex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Blackwell's Adm'r v. BraggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  3. Fishburne v. FergusonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
  2. Kelly v. HamblenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  3. McClung v. Sewell Valley RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Beale's Adm'r v. GordonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  5. Currie v. ChowningSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API