Legal Opinion
Young v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided June 16, 1993No. 05-89-00571-CRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
848 S.W.2d 203 (1992)
Lee Arthur YOUNG, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 05-89-00571-CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
December 28, 1992.
Discretionary Review Refused June 16, 1993.
Rober T. Rogers, Dallas, for appellant.
Sharon Batjer, Dallas, for appellee.
Before ENOCH, C.J, and BAKER and ONION[1] JJ.
OPINION ON REMAND
BAKER, Justice.
On original submission, we held the evidence sufficient to support the verdict and that the trial court did not err in overruling appellant's Batson[2] motion. See Young v. State, No. 05-89-00571-CR (Tex.App Dallas, March 5, 1990) (not designated for…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.