Hunsaker v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Justice SCOTT.
I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion herein for three reasons. First, the opinion is premised upon moral grounds that greed justifies punishment. Yet, I find no evidence of greed in the record; just a defense by two daughters of their mother, Mildred Hunsaker’s (Mil*71dred), right to the commissioners’ award of $656,782.50, which the record implies the mother had already spent.1 Secondly, the majority believes the daughters, Betty Hunsaker (Betty) and Peggy Greer (Peggy), were hoping to collect a judgment in excess of the commissioners’ award…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. PriestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Stickley v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
- Works v. WinkleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.