Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hunsaker v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2007No. 2005-SC-000974-DGPublished

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Justice SCOTT.

I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion herein for three reasons. First, the opinion is premised upon moral grounds that greed justifies punishment. Yet, I find no evidence of greed in the record; just a defense by two daughters of their mother, Mildred Hunsaker’s (Mil*71dred), right to the commissioners’ award of $656,782.50, which the record implies the mother had already spent.1 Secondly, the majority believes the daughters, Betty Hunsaker (Betty) and Peggy Greer (Peggy), were hoping to collect a judgment in excess of the commissioners’ award…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. PriestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  4. Stickley v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  5. Works v. WinkleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API