Legal Opinion

Redwine v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 5, 1952No. 8 Div. 114Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

Appellee has filed a motion to strike appellant’s application for rehearing because the application was not written on transcript or folio paper, but on legal cap paper.

Appellee contends that his motion must be granted because of the provisions of Supreme Court Rule 36, the pertinent provisions of which are as follows:

“All applications to this court to admit bail, or for the writ of habeas corpus, mandamus, or other zvrit or process depending on motion of this court, * * *, shall be presented on folio paper, of the pattern now required by the rule for ordinary transcripts, so…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kinney v. PollakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Parks v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API