Hill v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*867The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the petitioner’s motion, in effect, for leave to reargue the petition, since the Supreme Court did not overlook or misapprehend the facts or law in its initial determination, or mistakenly arrive at its earlier determination (see CPLR 2221 [d]; Everhart v County of Nassau, 65 AD3d 1277 [2009]; McDonald v Stroh, 44 AD3d 720, 721 [2007]; E.W. Howell Co., Inc. v S.A.F. La Sala Corp., 36 AD3d 653, 654 [2007]). The petitioner failed to offer a reasonable excuse for failing to serve a timely notice of claim. While the petitioner…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Felice v. Eastport/South Manor Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- E.W. Howell Co. v. S.A.F. La Sala Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Henriques v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Kittredge v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Carpenter v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Klass v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Khalid v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Sanchez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Lugo v. GNP BrokerageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Grasso v. Nassau CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.