Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Fowler

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 1923No. 2796. [fn*]PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). The cour.t overruled appellant’s and granted appellees’ motion to consolidate the two suits, and at the trial permitted appel-lees to open and conclude both in adducing testimony and in the argument. Appellant’s suit having been filed first, she insists that her motion should have befen granted, and that she, instead of appellees, should have been permitted to open and conclude the argument at the trial of the consolidated case.

The purpose of appellant’s motion was accomplished when the suits were consolidated, and we think it was of no importance that it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. ShufordTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Jackes-Evans Mfg. Co. v. GossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Donoho v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. J. W. Carter Music Co. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Boykin, Seddon & Co. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Price v. SeigerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API