Legal Opinion

Whetstone v. Freeman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 17, 1988No. 87-2417PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Rejecting the appellant’s sole point on appeal, we reiterate the universal rule that prior unsuccessful attempts to extradite the defendant, which were aborted because a governor’s warrant from the demanding state did not timely arrive in Florida, have no effect upon the efficacy of a subsequent extradition proceeding which, like this one, was properly supported by a valid warrant. State v. Dearing, 513 So.2d 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Murphy v. Boehm, 443 So.2d 363 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); accord, e.g., In re Blackburn, 701 P.2d 715 (Mont.1985); In re Hval, 148 Vt. 544, 537…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re HvalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  2. Petition of BlackburnMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Murphy v. BoehmDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. State v. DearingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Van BuskirkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Avant v. JuddDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API