Legal Opinion

State v. Nardi

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 21, 2001No. 4D99-4396PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevenson, J.

Anthony Nardi was convicted of both attempted sexual battery and burglary of a dwelling with battery. Nardi filed a rule 3.800 motion to correct illegal sentence on the ground that his conviction for both offenses ‘violated double jeopardy principles. The trial court agreed, set aside the attempted sexual battery conviction, and vacated the sentence associated with that offense. The State appeals and we reverse.

It is the express intent of the Legislature to convict and sentence a defendant for each offense he commits during the course of a single criminal episode. See § 775.021(4)(b), Fla.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ReardonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Crawford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Billiot v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. Washington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tambriz-Ramirez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Diego Tambriz-Ramirez v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  3. Diego Tambriz-Ramirez v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API