Legal Opinion

Conran v. Yager

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 9, 1975No. 19939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

Appellant (defendant below) appeals from the lower court’s granting of summary judgment in the respondent’s suit on a note. We conclude that the circuit court providently granted the motion for summary judgment as there were no material issues in dispute and under the facts presented by the respondent he was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Cisson v. Pickens Savings & Loan Association, 258 S. C. 37, 186 S. E. (2d) 822, and Garrett v. Reese, 262 S. C. 327, 204 S. E. (2d) 432. Accordingly, the judgment entered below is affirmed.

The respondent-plaintiff and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. J.B. Colt Company v. BrittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  2. Cisson v. Pickens Savings and Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Garrett v. ReeseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ray v. South Carolina National Bank, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Windham v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Merritt Ex Rel. Estate of Merritt v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  4. Deep Keel, LLC v. Atlantic Private Equity Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  5. Dawkins v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API