Legal Opinion

Manhattan Savings Institution v. Gottfried Baking Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff proved that the defendant breached its contract. The question whether the plaintiff suffered substantial damages by such breach is one of fact, and the determination of that question against the plaintiff in the courts below may not be reviewed in this court. The plaintiff was, however, entitled as matter of law to an award of nominal damages.

The judgments should be reversed and judgment directed for the plaintiff for six cents damage, without costs.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clearview Concrete Products Corp. v. S. Charles Gherardi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Freund v. Washington Square Press, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. McCoy Associates, Inc. v. Nulux, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  4. Good Karma Productions v. Penthouse International, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. UV Industries, Inc. v. Sharon Steel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API