Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 1989No. CR 89-89PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

Phillip Carl Wright appeals from his conviction of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, resulting in a sentence of life imprisonment. He advances two assignments of error: one, that a motion to suppress evidence should have been granted and, two, testimony of the arresting officers should not have been admitted. We reject the arguments and affirm the judgment.

At about 9:30 p.m. on May 4, 1988, Officer Kelly Martin observed appellant driving east on Interstate 630 in Little Rock at a high rate of speed. The officer turned on his blue lights and appellant pulled…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Jill Tinetti v. Lee Wittke, Sheriff Racine County, Jane Doe, a Racine County Matron Whose Name is Unknown, and County of RacineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  4. Tinetti v. WittkeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1979
  5. Hines v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Kearse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Wimbley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Kearse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API