Legal Opinion

Cal. Grape Control Bd., Ltd. v. Boothe Fruit Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1934No. Docket No. Sac. 4652PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The plaintiff, a co-operative marketing corporation, organized under the laws of California for the purpose of securing the benefits of the Federal Agricultural Marketing Act, caused to be grouped together in the year 1930, a large percentage of the grape acreage of California, by securing the signatures of the owners of such acreage to a uniform marketing agreement constituting it their selling agent. One Swanson, a signatory to such uniform agreement, had a grape yield on his acreage in Stanislaus County, for the year 1930, of about 100 tons. In September, 1930, through his agent, one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marland Refining Co. v. DuffySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Lowe v. Yolo Cty. Consol. Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Matta v. KatsoulasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dart Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Eastman Kodak Company, a Corporation v. John C. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Dart Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. Hendricks v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API