Legal Opinion

In re Grand Jury Subpoena

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 13, 2014No. Case No. 13-50987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOVANT’S MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENA

(Redacted)

DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.

Can the sole employee and owner of a corporation rely on the Fifth Amendment to refuse production of and testimony related to corporate documents subpoenaed by a grand jury? Settled law says the answer is “No,” for the most part, at least for the production part. But the sole agent of a one-person collective entity, such as a corporation, can assert her Fifth Amendment privilege to refuse testimony *971beyond certifying that the documents are authentic, that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Embry v. Discount Motors, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API