Legal Opinion
Donald v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided February 5, 2009No. Claim No. 115414PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Frank P. Milano, J.
Claimant moves pursuant to CPLR 3212 for partial summary judgment as to defendant’s liability on this wrongful confinement claim. The claim alleges that the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS) unlawfully added a period of mandatory postrelease supervision (PRS) onto claimant’s sentence even though the PRS term was never imposed by the sentencing judge. Claimant further alleges that the administratively imposed PRS term ultimately resulted in claimant’s unlawful confinement “for a period of at least 676 days,” until claimant’s…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Hill v. United States Ex Rel. WamplerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- People v. SparberNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Donald v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Moulton v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Donald v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Standsblack v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Moulton v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013