Legal Opinion

Schempp v. Schempp

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 15, 1976No. BB-470PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYER, Chief Judge.

Appellee’s motion to quash raises the issue whether and to what extent the “law of the case” concept applies when an order of the trial court which has been upheld by way of interlocutory appeal is again challenged by way of final appeal. After the trial court entered its order of partial summary judgment in favor of appellee (plaintiff in the trial court), appellants filed their notice of interlocutory appeal. This Court fully considered the arguments of appellants on the merits and dismissed the interlocutory appeal. Schempp v. Schempp, Fla.App. 1st 1976, 327 So.2d 120.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strazzulla v. HendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  2. McGregor v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Harvey v. City of St. PetersburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. Schempp v. SchemppDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goodman v. OlsenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Wallace v. PL DODGE MEMORIAL HOSP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. REALTY MARTS INTERN., INC. v. BarlowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. City of Gainesville, d/b/a Gainesville Regional Utilities v. Jacob T. RodgersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
  5. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Caduceus Self Insurance FundDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API