Grady v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.
This case presents the question whether a properly-granted zoning variance may be deemed to have “taken effect” pursuant to G. L. c. 40A, § 11, where it was not recorded with the registry of deeds within the one-year lapse period set forth in G. L. c. 40A, § 10, but was recorded eleven days thereafter, and where the holders have substantially relied upon it. The question whether a variance will take effect if the holders have substantially relied upon it was left open in Cornell v. Board of *726Appeals of Dracut, 453 Mass. 888, 891 n.7 (2009) {Cornell). In the unusual circumstances of this case,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hanlon v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Harvard Crimson, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Britton v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Shirley Wayside Ltd. Partnership v. Board of Appeals of ShirleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburgers of New York, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Buccaneer Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of LenoxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- 92 Montvale, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of StonehamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Buccaneer Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of LenoxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- Haggerty v. Borrego Solar Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2016
- Reeve v. GodfreyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.