Commonwealth v. Chmiel
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
Appellant David Chmiel was convicted of three counts of murder in the first degree, three counts of robbery, one count of burglary, and two counts of theft by unlawful taking. The jury at the sentencing hearing determined that Appellant should be sentenced to death. Post-trial motions were filed. Appellant then filed a pro se Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA) petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court appointed new counsel and stayed the post-trial motions. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court dismissed the PCHA petition.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. ZettlemoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. RollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.