Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 3, 1986No. Nos. 84-1168, 84-1182 and 84-1196Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSwygert, Senior Circuit Judge

I dissent from that part of the majority opinion dismissing the claims of the Citizens for a Better Environment (“CBE”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because I believe its claims are cognizable in this court. Regarding the merits of CBE’s claims, I would order that the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) commence federal rulemaking to promulgate a state implementation plan (“SIP”) for the State of Indiana that complies with all of the requirements of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. (1982).

I

In this case, CBE raises the following claims: (1) the EPA could not, as it…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe of Ariz.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API