Nonnenmacher v. City of Warwick
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEDERBERG, Justice.
The plaintiffs, Harold J. Nonnenmacher and Donald E. Sjogren, filed suit under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, claiming that § 7-75.2(b) of the Warwick Code of Ordinances (1993), violates Article 1, section 10, of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution 1 because its setoff provision required a reduction in disability pension benefits paid to retired firefighters whose earned income during retirement exceeded certain limits. The plaintiffs and the defendants — the City of Warwick, the members of the Warwick Board of Public Safety, individually and in their…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Johnston Ambulatory Surgical Associates, Ltd. v. NolanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp. v. Bowen Court AssociatesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- Palazzolo v. State Ex Rel. TavaresSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Votolato v. MerandiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Simeone v. CharronSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.