Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Stockmen's National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1929No. 27108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is a motion by appellee to quash the bill of exceptions on the ground that it does not contain all material evidence offered and admitted at the trial in the district court. In resisting the motion appellant contends that there is an authentic and conclusive certificate of the trial judge allowing the bill of exceptions and stating that it contains all the evidence.

The bill of exceptions shows on its face that it does not contain testimony admitted at a former trial and again offered in evidence and again admitted at the trial resulting in the judgment of which appellant now complains.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HaysNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Nelson v. JenkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Greene v. GreeneNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. I. Oberfelder & Co. v. KavanaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Storz v. FinklesteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Patterson v. KerrNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Preston v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API