Legal Opinion

LaFlamme v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 19, 1991No. 89-02343PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the defendant’s two convictions without discussion. We reverse his sentence on the lewd, lascivious, or indecent assault conviction because the trial court scored forty points for penetration under victim injury when it should have scored only twenty points for contact. See Daum v. State, 544 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 551 So.2d 462 (Fla.1989); O’Bright v. State, 508 So.2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). On remand, the trial court may reimpose the same sentence because, even with the twenty fewer points, the defendant’s total points will still fall within the same permitted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'BRIGHT v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Daum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Luhrsen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API