Legal Opinion

Everett National Bank v. Deschuiteneer

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 17, 1968No. 5660PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The question in this case is whether s. 9-307 (2) of the Uniform Commercial Code (RSA 382-A:9-307 (2)) is limited in its application to transactions between a consumer seller and a consumer buyer. Except for a dictum in one case (National Shawmut Bank v. Vera, 223 N. E. 2d 515 ) there is no specific case in point, although several commentators familiar with the Uniform Commercial Code have discussed the problem.

In pertinent part s. 9-307(2) reads as follows: “In the case of consumer goods ... a buyer takes free of a security interest even though perfected if he buys without knowledge of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Shawmut Bank of Boston v. VeraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Muir v. Jefferson Credit Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Balon v. Cadillac Automobile Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. PateMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  4. First Dallas County Bank v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Citizens National Bank of Temple v. BaggerlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API