Harris v. Dacus
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtRobins, J.
Appellant brought this suit in the lower court to enforce specific performance of a contract under which he alleged appellees, A. P. Dacus and P. M. Dacus, through their agent, W. M. Burns, agreed to sell appellant a 24% acre tract in Mississippi county, Arkansas. Appellee, J. H. Doan, was made a defendant, it being-alleged that he had obtained a conveyance of the land from A. P. Dacus, P. M. Dacus and Ohloe Dacus, with full knowledge that these parties had already agreed to sell same to appellant, and- appellant prayed that this conveyance to appellee Doan be canceled.
In their answer…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dickinson v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Swain v. BurnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wilson v. WintersTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Poplin v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
- Johnson v. BrookMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wyatt v. YinglingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Routen v. Walthour-Flake Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Bowden v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949