Legal Opinion

Harris v. Dacus

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 8, 1946No. 4-7870PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobins, J.

Appellant brought this suit in the lower court to enforce specific performance of a contract under which he alleged appellees, A. P. Dacus and P. M. Dacus, through their agent, W. M. Burns, agreed to sell appellant a 24% acre tract in Mississippi county, Arkansas. Appellee, J. H. Doan, was made a defendant, it being-alleged that he had obtained a conveyance of the land from A. P. Dacus, P. M. Dacus and Ohloe Dacus, with full knowledge that these parties had already agreed to sell same to appellant, and- appellant prayed that this conveyance to appellee Doan be canceled.

In their answer…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Swain v. BurnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Wilson v. WintersTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Poplin v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Johnson v. BrookMississippi Supreme Court · 1856

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. YinglingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  2. Routen v. Walthour-Flake Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. Bowden v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API