Denver Policemen's Protective Ass'n v. Lichtenstein
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the district court’s dismissal of appellants’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The appellants are the Denver Policemen’s Protective Association and individual officers of the Denver police force, hereinafter collectively referred to as the Association.
The alleged cause of action arose from an order compelling discovery of police investigative files issued by Judge Lichtenstein of the Second Judicial District Court in and for the City and County of Denver. This order was entered following a hearing on a pretrial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Stidham v. Peace Officer Standards & TrainingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Flanagan v. MungerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- People v. WalkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.