Legal Opinion

Denver Policemen's Protective Ass'n v. Lichtenstein

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 18, 1981No. 80-1313PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the district court’s dismissal of appellants’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The appellants are the Denver Policemen’s Protective Association and individual officers of the Denver police force, hereinafter collectively referred to as the Association.

The alleged cause of action arose from an order compelling discovery of police investigative files issued by Judge Lichtenstein of the Second Judicial District Court in and for the City and County of Denver. This order was entered following a hearing on a pretrial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  2. Stidham v. Peace Officer Standards & TrainingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. Flanagan v. MungerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. People v. WalkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API