Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Corbin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1998No. 97-2459PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F), respondent, Charles Canterbury Corbin, Attorney Registration No. 0034178, last known address in Denver, Colorado, be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio until such time as he is reinstated to the practice of law in Colorado.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondent, Charles Canterbury Corbin, immediately cease and desist from the practice of law in any form and is hereby forbidden to appear on behalf of another before any court,, judge, commission, board, administrative agency; or other public authority.

IT…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CorbinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. CorbinOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Enedeo Rodriguez, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API