Legal Opinion

Bank of Bellbuckle v. Mason

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1917PublishedCited by 9 opinions

FROM BEDFORD. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Bedford County.- — •'Walteb S. Bearden, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

The complainant sued the defendants as partners composing the firm of J. M. Mason & Co. to recover $5,505.57 overdraft, together with accrued interest, making the sum of $6,585.54. A judgment was rendered for the latter sum. Defendant Hoover appealed.

It appears that the defendants were partners in the mercantile business at Bellbuckle. About October, 1912, they fell in debt to the hank by overdraft in the sum of about $3,000. Hoover was the money ed man of the firm, but did not stay in the store or give any attention to the business, its conduct being confided wholly to Mason, in whom Hoover…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  2. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
  3. Dawson, Blackmore & Co. v. ElrodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  4. Bradley Fertilizer Co. v. Pollock & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Johnston & Co. v. Dutton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rodney Wayne Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Williston v. ScherrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. California Canning Peach Growers v. Bardell & OregoniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. First Tennessee Production Credit Ass'n v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Arrington v. Columbia Nitrogen Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API