Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brady v. Smotherman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 3, 1935No. 24582Published

1DissentStephens, J.

Notwithstanding the doctrine of caveat emptor applies to a purchaser at a sheriff’s sale (Code of 1933, § 39-1307), it does not apply where the sale is void and the purchaser, by reason of the invalidity of the sale, upon the ground of a void levy, or otherwise, acquires no title. In Corley v. Jarrell, 36 Ga. App. 225 (136 S. E. 177), it was held that where a sheriff’s sale was void by reason of an invalid levy, the purchaser was not liable upon his bid. The court there expressly stated that “the levy and sale being void, the doctrine of caveat emptor is inapplicable.” See also 23 0. J. 655,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brooks v. RooneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Schwinger v. . HickokNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Forbes v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Roser v. Georgia Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Solomon v. PetersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API