Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 8, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Morris, Commissioner

Reversing.

Appellant, Aaron and Carl Bradley, and Wes Campbell were charged with shooting and wounding Lacy Triplett, the indictment following the language of Kentucky Statutes, Section 1166, which denounces the offense and fixes punishment.

Prior to trial Carl Bradley had died, and at the close of commonwealth’s evidence motion for -a péremp-tory was sustained as to Campbell. Upon submission the jury declared Aaron not guilty, but found appellant guilty, inflicting a two years’ imprisonment. On appeal it is contended that:(a) The court erred in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cupp v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  2. Davidson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Drake v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Norton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nolan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  2. Shepherd v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API