Wilson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The appellant seeks review of the trial court’s summary denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence. A rule 3.800 motion can be the proper vehicle in which to raise a Hale claim more than two years after the verdict if the issue can be resolved from the face of the entire written record. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998); West v. State, 790 So.2d 513 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Pullins v. State, 111 So.2d 451 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Valdes v. State, 765 So.2d 774 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
The record consists of the entire written record, not just the record on appeal.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MancinoSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Valdes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- West v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Atwood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Ace Delivery Service, Inc. v. BoydSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mintz v. Broward Correctional InstituteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Johnson v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001