Legal Opinion

State v. Griswold

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 13, 2000No. 17086-1-IIIPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

A jury found Jeffrey Griswold guilty of third degree child molestation. He contends the trial court erred when it: (1) admitted testimony regarding prior bad acts as showing a common scheme or plan; (2) excluded evidence of his reputation for sexual morality; and (3) found that certain impeachment evidence was inadmissible as collateral. The unique use of a truth or dare game combined with other similarities support the trial court’s decision to admit the prior bad act testimony. Although we conclude reputation for sexual morality is relevant, we decide a proper foundation was not established…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. MichielliWashington Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. DeVincentisWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. DeVincentisWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. State v. Perez-ValdezWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. LopezWashington Supreme Court · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API