Holmes v. Business Relocation Services, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. As a matter of law, it cannot be said that Business Relocation Services, Inc., the alleged special employer, overcame the presumption of continuing general employment by “clear [ly] demonstrati [ng] . . . surrender of control by the general employer and assumption of control by the special employer” (Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553, 557 [1991]). The Appellate Division correctly determined that issues of fact remained as to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- The People v. Glenford C. HullNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- Bayona v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Cartagena v. Access Staffing, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Winkler v. Halmar Intl., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Winkler v. Halmar Intl., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.