Legal Opinion

Loegler v. C. v. Hill & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 1940No. 6 Div. 490PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The question in this case is whether ap-pellee is liable in a suit against it for damages for the breach of a verbal contract •of warranty in a sale made to appellant of a refrigeration outfit by Dawson. Dawson •and appellant executed a contract of sale whereby the title was to remain in Dawson as security for the purchase price, and which was assigned to appellee immediately upon its execution, and whereby ap-pellee furnished a large part of the outfit which it produced. The unit was sold by Dawson completely assembled and installed. But it was not so manufactured. Dawson…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Birmingham Post Co. v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Herring v. SkaggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  3. Herring, Farrell & Sherman v. SkaggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  4. Luquire Funeral Homes Ins. Co. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Blue Star Navigation Co. v. Emmons Coal Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lawson State Community College v. First Continental Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Credit Alliance Corp. v. Cornelius & Rush Coal Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1980
  4. Tenet HealthSystem Philadelphia, Inc. v. National Union of Hospital & Health Care Employees (In Re Allegheny Health, Education & Research Foundation)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API