Legal Opinion

Pantages v. Arge

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1953No. 7977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Paul Pantages and Sam Arge engaged in a partnership, buying and selling grapes.-. The adventure floundered on the rocks of' discord. Pantages sued Arge for an ac-" counting of money claimed; Arge countered in kind. The trial court awarded Pantages $1,173.28. Arge appeals claiming’ the following additional credits:

1. Alleged sale of truck at less than value................ $ 500.00

2. Wages paid to Tom Argeropolis ...:................. ' '225.00

3. Traveling expenses ......... 309:72

4. Truck insurance.... 206.26

5. Accounting services ........ 150.00

$1,390.98.'

This action for an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanley v. StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Toomer's Estate v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Sullivan v. Beneficial Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Stevens v. GrayUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Crockett v. Nish Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burnham v. BrayIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Clotworthy v. ClydeUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Tyree's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Estate Of Frank H. KnippCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  5. Estate of Knipp v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API