Legal Opinion
Ungar v. Arafat
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 9, 2011No. 10-2145PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal, brought by a putative intervenor, has its genesis in an injunction issued in a bitter dispute between victims of terrorist violence and governmental entities in the Palestinian territories. The putative intervenor claims that the injunction, which does not refer to it by name, has frozen its assets. The district court rejected this claim and denied the motion to intervene. After careful consideration, we conclude that the putative intervenor has failed to demonstrate that it has a sufficient interest in the underlying action to justify intervention as of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- R & G Mortgage Corp. v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Cmm Cable Rep., Inc., D/B/A Creative Media Management, Inc. v. Ocean Coast Properties, Inc., D/B/A Wpor-FmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. MoloneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Genereux v. Raytheon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- City of Chicago v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Maine Medical Center v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. The Town of BarnstableCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.