Legal Opinion

Krisher v. Sharpe

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 15, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-5594PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER

HUYETT, District Judge.

This civil action raises the issue whether a Pennsylvania State Police regulation prohibiting a State Police Officer from running for political office violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to enjoin defendants from enforcing Pennsylvania State Police Field Regulation 1-1, Section 1.12. Based upon the findings of fact stipulated to by counsel and conclusions of law, I deny plaintiff’s motion for a permanent injunction, and dismiss his complaint.

I

Plai…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. State Conference of State Police LodgesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Adams v. Supreme Court of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brazil-Breashears v. BilandicCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Brazil-Breashears v. BilandicCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Claussen v. PenceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Moses v. Town of WythevilleDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1997
  5. Krisher (Porter E.) v. Sharpe (Ronald), Werts (Robert G.), Young (Brook), Mooney (Richard)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API