Vennum v. Vennum
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Cirpuit Court of Iroquois county; the Hon. Charles H. Wood, Judge, presiding. This was an action of forcible detainer, to recover possession of certain premises, brought by Hiram Yennum against Thomas J. Yennum.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Cirpuit Court of Iroquois county; the Hon. Charles H. Wood, Judge, presiding. This was an action of forcible detainer, to recover possession of certain premises, brought by Hiram Yennum against Thomas J. Yennum. On the trial the plaintiff introduced in evidence the following written notice: “Thomas J. Yennum, Esq.: You are hereby notified that in consequence of the expiration of your lease, which expired August 22, A. D. 1868, also your default in the payment of the rent of the premises now occupied by you, being lots 2 and 6 in block Ho. 11, in the village of Milford, in the…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton
Appellee commenced proceedings before a justice of the peace, to obtain possession of certain premises, under section 1 of chapter 43 of the statutes, entitled “ Forcible entry and detainer.” This case was tried before the justice, and taken by appeal to the circuit court of Iroquois county.
That court found the defendant guilty, and rendered judgment that the plaintiff have restitution of the premises. The appellant brings the case to this court, and has assigned several causes of error.
On the 22d of August, 1866, Henry J. Fry and appellant executed a written agreement, by the terms of which…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. TravelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Scanlon v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- In Re CashIllinois Supreme Court · 1943