Legal Opinion

Nuclear Metals, Inc. v. Mayer

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided July 13, 1993No. 92-3703-GPublished

1Opinion of the CourtFlannery, J.

The plaintiff, Nuclear Metals, Inc. (NMI), seeks a declaration pursuant to G.L.c. 231A that the statutory assessment charged it by the defendant, Massachusetts Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Board (Board), is unconstitutional either because it is a tax or because it violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. NMI also seeks a declaration that the assessment scheme is violative of the due process clause of the United States Constitution because the statute and regulations fail to provide for a hearing prior to notice of a violation. Finally, NMI challenges the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wyoming v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Danielle J. Pittsley v. Sergeant Philip WarishCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Howes Bros. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Emerson College v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Haverhill Manor, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API