Legal Opinion

United States v. Alexander McAllister

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 3, 1968No. 16805_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

We find no reversible error in the trial below. Therefore, the judgment must be affirmed.

At the same time we observe that there is substantial evidence in the record which indicates strongly that the appellant has been rehabilitated. He seems to be legitimately employed and to be supporting his wife, their several children and his widowed mother. Therefore, we think it would be appropriate for the Department to make further inquiry to the end that, if justified, appellant’s deportation at least be stayed during his good behavior.

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Donald Scott Fults v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Yinggui Lin v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Victoria Lamadora Vergel v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  3. Amado A. David v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. Petition of Guerrero-MoralesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
  5. Yinggui Lin v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009