Jones v. . Judd
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The plaintiffs were stopped in the prosecution of the work, in fulfilment of their contract, by the authority of the state officers. Before this injunction was removed, the law of March 29, 1842, for preserving the credit of the state, was passed, which put an end to the original contract, and the agreement between the plaintiffs and defendant which grew out of it. (3Mass. Rep. 331; Doughty v. Neal, 1 Saund. R. 216, noteb, 5th ed.; 10 John. 28.)
As the plaintiffs…
2Cited by38 opinions
- Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Spalding v. . RosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Danolds v. . the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Adler v. MilesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
- Joseph Scaduto v. Anthony J. Orlando, D/B/A A. J. Orlando Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.