Legal Opinion

Anonymous v. Weiner

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1966PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Sarafite, J.

Petitioner instituted this article 78 CPLR proceeding, in the nature of mandamus, for an order directing respondent to change the sex designated on petitioner’s birth certificate from “ male ” to “ female ” and, consonant therewith, to change the given name thereon to one assumed by petitioner subsequent to birth and to issue and substitute a new certificate.

The petitioner is a transsexual. (See Benjamin, Clinical Aspects of Transsexualism in the Male and Female, vol. 18, No. 3, American Journal of Psychotherapy, 458-469 [July, 1964]; Benjamin, Nature and Management of Transsexualism: With a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Matter of Bakers Mut. Ins. Co.(dept. of Health)New York Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. M. T. v. J. T.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. In re AnonymousCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
  3. K. v. Health Div., Dept. of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In re Declaratory Relief for LadrachStark County Probate Court · 1987
  5. K v. Health Div., Dept. of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API