Legal Opinion

State v. Flodin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 17, 2009No. 2008-675PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.

The defendant, Ralph C. Flodin, was convicted in Superior Court (Brown, J.) of aggravated felonious sexual assault (AFSA) and sexual assault (SA). See RSA 632-A:2, 1(g)(1) (Supp. 2008); RSA 632-A4, 1(a) (Supp. 2008). Because the evidence was insufficient to establish that the defendant provided therapy to the alleged victim within the meaning of RSA 632-A:l, VI (Supp. 2008), we reverse.

Viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the State, the jury could have found the following facts. See State v. Dodds, 159 N.H. 239, 246 (2009). The defendant was a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DoddsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. In re StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. State v. KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. State v. FossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  2. State v. FANDOZZISupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  3. Appeal of StewartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API