Legal Opinion

Peikert v. Repple

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 1, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action in equity to set aside two trust deeds as fraudulent conveyances and to enjoin the foreclosure commenced. The petition also contained counts in ejectment and to determine title. Parties, other than defendant Repple (owner and mortgagor of the real estate), were his two daughters (cestuis in the trust deeds, one note made to each), the trustee named (who had advertised foreclosure), and the unknown owner or owners of the notes. A temporary injunction against foreclosure was granted when this suit was filed. Thereafter defendant, Heldmann, claimed to own both notes, asked to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Castorina v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. Friedel v. BaileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. George v. SurkampSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Farmers & Traders Bank v. KendrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. First National Bank v. FrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aetna Ins. Co. v. O'malley.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Connell v. Jersey Realty & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. Ver Standig v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Ellis v. FarmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Trotter v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API