Legal Opinion

Holley v. Meyer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 7, 2005No. 99-56611PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge.

In Meyer v. Holley, 537 U.S. 280, 123 S.Ct. 824, 154 L.Ed.2d 753 (2003), the Supreme Court vacated this Court’s opinion in Holley v. Meyer, 258 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir.2001) and remanded for further proceedings. In revisiting this case, we address two distinct questions which the Supreme Court has left for us to decide. First, whether as the designated officer/broker of Triad, Inc., David Meyer can be held personally liable for the actions of Triad’s employee Grove Crank. Second, whether David Meyer can be held liable through the piercing of Triad’s corporate veil. We remand to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Eric D. Oliver v. Jerry Keller, Sheriff Kyle Edwards Dave SwiekertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Meyer v. HolleySupreme Court of the United States · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holley v. CrankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Hau v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  3. United States v. Mark JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API