Legal Opinion

Diagnostic Services of South Florida v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 31, 2004No. Nos. 3D02-3122, 3D02-3129Published

1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.

In these two consolidated appeals, the Miami-Dade County Court has certified questions of great public importance. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.160. We conclude that Diagnostic Services of South Florida (“Diagnostic”) was not a “clinic” under section 456.0375, Florida Statutes (2001), and was not required to register under that statute.

I

Diagnostic is a company which owns portable diagnostic testing equipment. At the request of a health care provider, Diagnostic takes its equipment to the health care provider’s office to perform diagnostic tests on the patient. Examples of such tests are comparative…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doyle v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS REGULATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Eager v. Florida Keys Aqueduct AuthorityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API